The comments section for the 09/21 1:30pm Life Enrichment meeting was so difficult to find aka inaccessible to the public, and by the time I figured it out, comments were closed, so I'm leaving my feedback here. It was emphasized repeatedly that the policy presented was not created with the intention to criminalize unhoused people. However, the standards listed that the city expects unhoused people to meet in order to not be CRIMINALIZED by police with poor or no training on how to handle interactions with those who experience mental health issues, abuse, poverty or addiction were not matched with the bare minimum: reciprocation of support. Examples: utilities, case work, trash pickup, food, temporary or PERMANENT housing. It should be obvious that unhoused people are not "inconveniencing" businesses, streets or pedestrians out of pure recklessness or laziness. Every unhoused person has either traumas, illnesses, disabilities, struggles, institutional oppressions they face or needs that can be listened to and met with money that the city DOES have. Treating houseless people as "equals" to housed people is not enough when housed people are not subjected to the same struggles. Struggles that can be traced back to institutional neglect of the marginalized and under-privileged. This is beyond their control and should not be treated as such. This policy is classist, selfish and inhumane.